[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1061289: marked as done (apt-cache show should include Uploaders in output)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:17:56 +0100
with message-id <20240122101542.GA75591@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1061289: apt-cache show should include Uploaders in output
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061289,
regarding apt-cache show should include Uploaders in output
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1061289: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061289
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apt
Version: 2.6.1
Severity: wishlist

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Dear Maintainers,

The output of `apt-cache show` should include Uploaders as well as
Maintainers, in order to make it easier to find other co-maintainers and
uploaders of team-maintained packages.

The only alternatives are finding the relevant stanza in Sources (either
online in the Debian archive or in /var/lib/apt/lists), or checking on
a website like packages.d.o or tracker.d.o.

Kind regards,
Maytham

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=YF7y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:35:55PM +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 2.6.1
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> Dear Maintainers,
> 
> The output of `apt-cache show` should include Uploaders as well as
> Maintainers, in order to make it easier to find other co-maintainers and
> uploaders of team-maintained packages.
> 
> The only alternatives are finding the relevant stanza in Sources (either
> online in the Debian archive or in /var/lib/apt/lists), or checking on
> a website like packages.d.o or tracker.d.o.

apt-cache show includes all fields in the Packages file. You can try to
convince dpkg maintainer to copy the uploader field into the deb when
building it, and the ftpteam to then include the field in the Packages
file, but I'd encourage you to just use the Sources files.
-- 
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer                              i speak de, en

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: