[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1043577: apt: 'Missing Signed-By in the sources.list(5) entry' for trusted repository



Package: apt
Version: 2.7.3
Severity: minor

On 'apt upgrade', the following message is displayed:

  N: Missing Signed-By in the sources.list(5) entry for 'file:/usr/src/deb'

As this source is trusted (relevant sources.list.d entry included
below), it does not need Signed-By. Please do not display this message
for trusted repositories.


-- Package-specific info:

-- (/etc/apt/preferences present, but not submitted) --


-- (no /etc/apt/sources.list present) --


-- (/etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.sources present, but not submitted) --


-- /etc/apt/sources.list.d/local.sources --

Types: deb
URIs: file:/usr/src/deb/
Suites: /
Trusted: yes
Description: local

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'experimental')
merged-usr: no
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  adduser                 3.137
ii  base-passwd             3.6.1
ii  debian-archive-keyring  2023.4
ii  gpgv                    2.2.40-1.1
ii  libapt-pkg6.0           2.7.3
ii  libc6                   2.37-7
ii  libgcc-s1               13.2.0-1
ii  libgnutls30             3.7.9-2
ii  libseccomp2             2.5.4-1+b3
ii  libstdc++6              13.2.0-1
ii  libsystemd0             254-1

Versions of packages apt recommends:
ii  ca-certificates  20230311

Versions of packages apt suggests:
ii  apt-doc                      2.7.3
pn  aptitude | synaptic | wajig  <none>
ii  dpkg-dev                     1.21.22
ii  gnupg                        2.2.40-1.1
pn  powermgmt-base               <none>

-- no debconf information


Reply to: