> Just to add a rather unrelated argument for the nodoc support in apt. apt is For the record: I wrote nodoc and pkg.apt.nodoxygen support earlier last month and have it finally proposed earlier today in a MR request… https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/238 Another argument is actually that it helps our own CI tests: We do not build the packages so far, but we build i386 and amd64 to run tests in different setups (as root and as non-root) and building the docs twice is kinda pointless, so now we don't do this anymore while also using apts support for build-profiles to make cuts on setup costs as well. So… > Thanks, if it intrigues and inspires you, go for it, though I'd hate to > send you too deep down that rabbit hole otherwise... don't worry, I got a bit sidetracked and there could be done a lot more (as always) but sometimes I enjoy digging myself into a hole even if nobody really needs it… with three-ish (potential) "wouldn't it be nice" users this feature set might even be in the upper bracket of usefulness for things I did in these rabbit hole endeavours… ;P Best regards David Kalnischkies
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature