[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: First Packaging Con 2021



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 09:06 +0200, Wolf Vollprecht wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> we're organizing a conference about software package management:
> https://packaging-con.org/
> 
> It's the first time that this event happens: we are trying to bring
> together many different package management communities, compare
> approaches,
> share lessons learned, etc.
> 
> It would be great to see people from the APT community there -- and
> maybe
> even a talk?! The call for presentations ends on August 31.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions or ideas for the
> conference!
> 
> Best,
> 
> Wolf

I am all for a conference of this nature. Thank you for sharing this.

It depends on what your target audience is aside from existing
packagers. I think it would be a good idea to have one or two talks
about how to get started with package management. Of course, the ways of
getting engaged various across communities, but I imagine there is a
well-sized set of characteristics each community has that can help
newbies get started.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Gwo/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: