[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#831762: apt data corrupts with MergeList



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 11:26 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > apt_pkg.Error: E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem
> with MergeList
> /var/lib/apt/lists/httpredir.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-
> amd64_Packages, E:The package lists or status file could not be parsed or
> opened.
> > Reading package lists... Error!
> > E: Encountered a section with no Package: header
> > E: Problem with MergeList
> /var/lib/apt/lists/httpredir.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-
> amd64_Packages
> > E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
> > 2016-07-19 / 13:07:30 ♒♒♒  ☹  => 100  
> 
> Given that APT did not download anything in that run, it seems
> like your hard disk or RAM is broken.

No. I don't think that may be the cause. I was it on 2 machines already. As I
mentioned, cleaning the troubling files makes it work again.

I'll try to reproduce this again and provide the details that David has asked.


- -- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=c3nS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: