(I am not allowed to talk on dose-devel@ as I am not subscribed – at least that is what I guess based on my inability to read the french response of the mailinglist – could that message be changed to include an english sentence as well at least?) On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:25:32AM +0200, Pietro Abate wrote: > On 12/05/16 06:45, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > So despite the danger that providing a patch will kill this discussion, the > > attached patch (and also upstream branch user/josch/apt-cudf-remove) makes sure > > that removal requests are not generated for package names that were earlier > > marked as installed. > > If everybody is happy with his patch, I'll merge it into master and I am fine with it if that is what you want. :) It slowly grows more and more on me as the right one, but that could just as well be "post patch ergo propter patch" [yes, I had latin in school instead of french] trying to avoid any work on that issue [1], rather than a truly objective opinion. > [1] That should really be: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/tree/doc/external-dependency-solver-protocol.txt (or /usr/share/doc/apt-doc/external-dependency-solver-protocol.txt.gz) Suggestions welcome as it came as a suprise to you guys, so you are probably better in figuring out the right place and words to write it down. Best regards David Kalnischkies
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature