[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#614259: marked as done (apt-utils: hash changes)



Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 23:20:45 +0200
with message-id <20150813212044.GA25994@crossbow>
and subject line Re: Bug#614259: apt-utils: hash changes
has caused the Debian Bug report #614259,
regarding apt-utils: hash changes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
614259: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614259
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-utils
Version: 0.8.10
Severity: normal

Hello,

currently apt-ftparchive (well, apt and whatever else, including the
python lib of it) knows MD5, SHA1, SHA256.
MD5 is not the most wanted hashing algorithmus anymore and so FTPMaster
just dropped its usage. We also intend to drop SHA256.

We would like to add SHA512 to the Release files, so it would be nice if
you can make that available (and allow its usage via the python api). We
then will end up with SHA1 and SHA512 only in our usage. (The sooner,
the better :) ).

(We should see if we can have it pass via the squeeze-updates suite,
that is, if you can have it patched into the squeeze code too)

Thanks.

-- 
bye, Joerg
<Getty> Wie würdet ihr remote die Netzwerk-Config restarten?
<Myon> Sehr vorsichtig?

Attachment: pgpHnxSd7Qag9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8.16~exp2

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:53:46AM +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
> I created a apt sha512 branch for this now, basic support is there,
> but needs some cleanup. Hopefully finished in the next few days.

That happened eventually and was merged, but this bug never closed…
Lets do this now.

In the future adding new hashes should be easier (aka without an ABI
break) btw…


Best regards

David Kalnischkies

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: