Bug#60910: marked as done ([methods/cdrom] apt able to use multiple CD drives)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:32:46 +0200
with message-id <20150813223217.GA3105@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#60910: apt able to use multiple CD drives
has caused the Debian Bug report #60910,
regarding [methods/cdrom] apt able to use multiple CD drives
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
60910: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=60910
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt
Version: 0.3.18
Severity: wishlist
It would be very nice if apt supported multiple CD (or DVD) drives,
to minimize disc swapping. There would need to be a way to tell it
where to look other than /cdrom.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wheat 2.2.14-compact #1 Fri Feb 18 19:14:31 MST 2000 i586
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.3-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10 1:2.95.2-7 The GNU stdc++ library
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8.0
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 12:23:02AM -0800, root wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.3.18
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It would be very nice if apt supported multiple CD (or DVD) drives,
> to minimize disc swapping. There would need to be a way to tell it
> where to look other than /cdrom.
We support this using udev since 0.8.0
--
Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member
See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.
Be friendly, do not top-post, and follow RFC 1855 "Netiquette".
- If you don't I might ignore you.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: