Bug#254887: marked as done (/usr/bin/apt-get: apt-get sould allow install local .deb files, calculate its dependences and install them)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:19:26 +0200
with message-id <20150813221807.GA1192@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#47379: Subject: apt: what about apt-get install file:/home/install/some_good_package-1.0_i386.deb ?
has caused the Debian Bug report #47379,
regarding /usr/bin/apt-get: apt-get sould allow install local .deb files, calculate its dependences and install them
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
47379: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=47379
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: /usr/bin/apt-get: apt-get sould allow install local .deb files, calculate its dependences and install them
- From: Cesar Martinez Izquierdo <listas@ono.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:06:12 +0200
- Message-id: <E1BaySz-0000Hp-00@rojo>
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.25
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/apt-get
Hello, I think that it would be nice that apt-get could install local
..deb files.
I mean, you have a file "foo_program.deb" and want to install in a way
similar to these:
# apt-get install --local foo_program.deb
or
# apt-get local-install foo_program.deb
Q- Which are the advantages of doing this? Why don't you use dpkg?
A- Because apt-get should calculate the dependences of
"foo_program.deb", then search the needed packages in configured
repositories, and download and install these extra packages.
It would be very very useful to hand made debian packages, or programs
that are being developed and still doesnt' have official Debian
packages, and don't have an APT repository.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686
Locale: LANG=es_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=es_ES@euro
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.4-1 GCC support library
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Mantas K." <mantas@lvmi.lt>, 47379-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#47379: Subject: apt: what about apt-get install file:/home/install/some_good_package-1.0_i386.deb ?
- From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:19:26 +0200
- Message-id: <20150813221807.GA1192@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <3C7678AC.6000609@lvmi.lt>
- References: <3C7678AC.6000609@lvmi.lt>
Version: 1.1~exp1
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:58:20PM +0100, Mantas K. wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #47379
> Followup-For: Bug #88616
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.4
>
> Hi,
>
> I think instalation of local packages trought apt should look like
> this:
>
> apt-get install file:/home/install/some_good_package-1.0_i386.deb
This works in experimental, with a path.
--
Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member
See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.
Be friendly, do not top-post, and follow RFC 1855 "Netiquette".
- If you don't I might ignore you.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: