Bug#271213: marked as done (apt-get moo works, apt-get moo -v does something else)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 21:50:51 +0200
with message-id <20150813214740.GA6655@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#271213: apt-get moo works, apt-get moo -v does something else
has caused the Debian Bug report #271213,
regarding apt-get moo works, apt-get moo -v does something else
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
271213: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271213
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: apt-get moo works, apt-get moo -v does something else
- From: Adam Heath <doogie@brainfood.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:14:42 -0500 (CDT)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409111712310.1481@gradall.private.brainfood.com>
package: apt-get
version: 0.5.27
severity: minor
apt-get moo displays a cow. apt-get moo -v displays something else. I would
think that -v is an option, not a command. I think moo would be the command,
and should always display a cow.
Also, it doesn't matter what order the 2 arguments are given in.
ps: This bug was based on aptitude moo -v{0,6}.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Adam Heath <doogie@brainfood.com>, 271213-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#271213: apt-get moo works, apt-get moo -v does something else
- From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 21:50:51 +0200
- Message-id: <20150813214740.GA6655@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409111712310.1481@gradall.private.brainfood.com>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409111712310.1481@gradall.private.brainfood.com>
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 05:14:42PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> package: apt-get
> version: 0.5.27
> severity: minor
>
> apt-get moo displays a cow. apt-get moo -v displays something else. I would
> think that -v is an option, not a command. I think moo would be the command,
> and should always display a cow.
>
> Also, it doesn't matter what order the 2 arguments are given in.
>
> ps: This bug was based on aptitude moo -v{0,6}.
Thanks for your bug report, but -v always shows the version number. Sorry.
Other applications do the same, BTW, although it's mostly called -V there.
Closing.
--
Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member
See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.
Be friendly, do not top-post, and follow RFC 1855 "Netiquette".
- If you don't I might ignore you.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: