Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:48:06 +0200 with message-id <20150813114806.GA10228@crossbow> and subject line Re: state of #334602 has caused the Debian Bug report #334602, regarding FetchedBytes is misleading. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 334602: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=334602 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: FetchedBytes is misleading.
- From: Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:37:12 -0700
- Message-id: <20051018213712.GA9536@smtp.vzavenue.net>
Package: apt Version: 0.6.41.0exp1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental At the end of an update, I get this: Fetched 20.5MB in 4s (4425kB/s) But it actually only fetched about 60-70kb of diffs. I think the FetchedBytes indicator should correspond to how much was actually downloaded, not to the total size of the list files. Daniel -- Package-specific info: -- apt-config dump -- APT ""; APT::Architecture "i386"; APT::Build-Essential ""; APT::Build-Essential:: "build-essential"; APT::Acquire ""; APT::Acquire::Translation "environment"; Dir "/"; Dir::State "var/lib/apt/"; Dir::State::lists "lists/"; Dir::State::cdroms "cdroms.list"; Dir::State::userstatus "status.user"; Dir::State::status "/var/lib/dpkg/status"; Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt/"; Dir::Cache::archives "archives/"; Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin"; Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin"; Dir::Etc "etc/apt/"; Dir::Etc::sourcelist "sources.list"; Dir::Etc::vendorlist "vendors.list"; Dir::Etc::vendorparts "vendors.list.d"; Dir::Etc::main "apt.conf"; Dir::Etc::parts "apt.conf.d"; Dir::Etc::preferences "preferences"; Dir::Bin ""; Dir::Bin::methods "/usr/lib/apt/methods"; Dir::Bin::dpkg "/usr/bin/dpkg"; DPkg ""; DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs ""; DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true"; -- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) -- -- /etc/apt/sources.list -- #deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ ../project/experimental main deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages apt depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 apt recommends no packages. -- no debconf informationAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 334602-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: state of #334602
- From: David Kalnischkies <david@kalnischkies.de>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:48:06 +0200
- Message-id: <20150813114806.GA10228@crossbow>
- In-reply-to: <491C9CD4.10400@gmail.com>
- References: <491C9CD4.10400@gmail.com>
Hi, On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:32:04PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > This should be fixed in modern versions of apt. Do you confirm? So, 7 years of silence are probably an implicit confirmation. At the very least it seems to work for me this way nowadays, hence closing. Best regards David KalnischkiesAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---