Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:45:32 +0200 with message-id <20150813114532.GA8461@crossbow> and subject line Re: Bug#330393: apt: Errors on Release download failure are baffling has caused the Debian Bug report #330393, regarding apt: Errors on Release download failure are baffling to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 330393: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=330393 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: apt: Errors on Release download failure are baffling
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:09:40 -0400
- Message-id: <E1EKMhp-00059u-2d@caradoc.them.org>
Package: apt Version: 0.6.41 Severity: normal I spent half an hour trying to figure out why Apt complained that a bunch of packages would be updated but were unauthenticated. It turns out that the Release.gpg on the server was OK, but the Release file was unreadable (permission denied). All apt-get update says after this is "Ign" without any hint as to why it's ignoring the file. An error message, maybe even "could not fetch", would be nicer... -- Package-specific info: -- apt-config dump -- APT ""; APT::Architecture "amd64"; APT::Build-Essential ""; APT::Build-Essential:: "build-essential"; Dir "/"; Dir::State "var/lib/apt/"; Dir::State::lists "lists/"; Dir::State::cdroms "cdroms.list"; Dir::State::userstatus "status.user"; Dir::State::status "/var/lib/dpkg/status"; Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt/"; Dir::Cache::archives "archives/"; Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin"; Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin"; Dir::Etc "etc/apt/"; Dir::Etc::sourcelist "sources.list"; Dir::Etc::vendorlist "vendors.list"; Dir::Etc::vendorparts "vendors.list.d"; Dir::Etc::main "apt.conf"; Dir::Etc::parts "apt.conf.d"; Dir::Etc::preferences "preferences"; Dir::Bin ""; Dir::Bin::methods "/usr/lib/apt/methods"; Dir::Bin::dpkg "/usr/bin/dpkg"; DPkg ""; DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs ""; DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges --apt || test $? -ne 10"; DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true"; DPkg::Tools ""; DPkg::Tools::Options ""; DPkg::Tools::Options::/usr/bin/apt-listchanges ""; DPkg::Tools::Options::/usr/bin/apt-listchanges::Version "2"; DPkg::Post-Invoke ""; DPkg::Post-Invoke:: "if [ -x /usr/bin/debsums ]; then /usr/bin/debsums --generate=nocheck -sp /var/cache/apt/archives; fi"; -- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) -- -- /etc/apt/sources.list -- #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r0a _Sarge_ - Official amd64 Binary-1 (20050613)]/ unstable contrib main deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib # AMD64 archive - currently flaky - 20050903 deb http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ unstable main contrib deb-src http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ unstable main contrib ## AMD64 archive #deb http://mirror.espri.arizona.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ unstable main contrib #deb-src http://mirror.espri.arizona.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ unstable main contrib # Java (Blackdown) deb ftp://ftp.tux.org/java/debian/ sarge non-free # Mplayer (Christian Marillat's packages) #deb http://cyberspace.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main deb http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc6 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages apt depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-7 GCC support library ii libstdc++6 4.0.1-7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 apt recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 330393-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#330393: apt: Errors on Release download failure are baffling
- From: David Kalnischkies <david@kalnischkies.de>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:45:32 +0200
- Message-id: <20150813114532.GA8461@crossbow>
- In-reply-to: <20050927213516.GT10180@alcor.net>
- References: <E1EKMhp-00059u-2d@caradoc.them.org> <20050927212122.GS10180@alcor.net> <20050927212424.GA21174@nevyn.them.org> <20050927213516.GT10180@alcor.net>
Version: 1.1~exp5 On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 02:35:16PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:24:24PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 02:21:22PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > This is necessary in order to maintain compatibility, since Release has > > > traditionally been optional. > > > > Does that preclude even a warning? The file's there, and the error > > wasn't "not found". Failing that, somewhere handy in the documentation > > to mention that "Ign" might mean "failed". > > A warning would be reasonable at this stage in the game. 10 years later this warning actually exists as we are finally going to deprecate unsigned repositories for good, therefore closing. Best regards David KalnischkiesAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---