[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg file?



Hi Jake,

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:36:14PM -0600, Jake McBride wrote:
> Hi i have an iPhone 4 running iOS 6.1.3 and I accidently overwrote the
> "install" unix exicutable file found in usr/lib/dpkg/methods/apt/ is there
> any way you could email me a zip of the "dpkg" folder or even just the
> "apt" folder

You reached the development list of apt. We work on creating and
maintaining it for the Linux distribution Debian and its derivatives
like Ubuntu. This list is not for user support questions of any kind.
These are better handled by the distribution/port-creator you got apt
from.

While I personally have heard that there is a port to Darwin/iPhone
floating around in the internet, I have never actually used nor seen it
and I doubt its much different for the other readers of this
mailinglist. So, this list is probably not your ideal contact point even
if we ignore the development aspect, that said let me try to answer it
anyway after 5 minutes of searchengine voodoo - and let me CC the
suspected author of the port as I have now a question, too:


> apt folder...
> 
> desc.apt
> names
> setup
> update
> 
> 
> just missing "install" I believe

You are right, just missing 'install'. I doubt that they are actually
used through as these scripts are for use with dselect – an old package
management frontend in Debian (shipped in the realm of dpkg). I would
bet they are dormant files in the port and not a cause for a problem if
missing…

I found deb packages which claim to be 0.6.X and 0.7.X apt versions
(which are a few years old), but which version you really have might be
important to know even if these files hardly change…, but, isn't your
frontend providing you with a reinstall option anyway?

On the other hand, my scavenger hunt for the source code of the iPhone
port turned up nothing which makes me a bit sad – which is also the
question I have for Jay as it would be nice if he could point me in the
right direction.

I doubt there is much point in merging the entire port if nobody of the
current team can work on it, but ports tend to carry also patches for
things which aren't strictly related to the port itself and would
actually be nice to have in mainline if only we would know about them…


Best regards

David Kalnischkies

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: