[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#519469: apt-get proposes to autoremove packages not yet installed



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I'm seeing what looks like a somwhat less severe version of this same
behavior.

As it stands, I have no packages listed as candidates for autoremoval:

========
root@apologia:~# apt-get autoremove
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 104 not upgraded.
========

Attempting to dist-upgrade results in candidates listed for autoremoval,
all but one of which are also listed as candidates for new-package
installation:

========
root@apologia:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer
required:
  librtmp0:i386 libzita-alsa-pcmi0 libzita-resampler1 uuid-dev
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gir1.2-atspi-2.0 libatspi2.0-dev librtmp1 librtmp1:i386
libsdl-gfx1.2-5 libzita-alsa-pcmi0 libzita-resampler1 nettle-dev
startpar uuid-dev
========

Something is screwy somewhere, though I'm not completely clear on
whether it's necessarily in apt or whether it might be in the dependency
constellation of some other package(s).

I'll hold off on completing this upgrade for a few days, in case this
gets any attention and there's anything useful to be discovered from my
system configuration.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=D13N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: