Bug#743657: apt: Minor typo in 'apt' man page
Package: apt
Version: 1.0
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I've found a minor typo in the 'apt' man page. Diff included.
Regards.
-- Package-specific info:
-- (/etc/apt/preferences present, but not submitted) --
-- (/etc/apt/sources.list present, but not submitted) --
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii debian-archive-keyring 2012.4
ii gnupg 1.4.16-1.1
ii libapt-pkg4.12 1.0
ii libc6 2.18-4
ii libgcc1 1:4.8.2-16
ii libstdc++6 4.8.2-16
apt recommends no packages.
Versions of packages apt suggests:
pn apt-doc <none>
ii aptitude 0.6.10-2
ii dpkg-dev 1.17.6
pn python-apt <none>
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/logrotate.d/apt changed [not included]
-- no debconf information
diff --git a/doc/apt.8.xml b/doc/apt.8.xml
index 8d3b00f..85e7276 100644
--- a/doc/apt.8.xml
+++ b/doc/apt.8.xml
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
<refsect1><title>Differences to &apt-get;</title>
<para>The <command>apt</command> command is meant to be pleasant for
- end users and does not need to be backward compatilbe like
+ end users and does not need to be backward compatible like
&apt-get;. Therefore some options are different:
<itemizedlist>
Reply to: