[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#743650: New apt color support is not made for black on white displays



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Package: apt
Version: 1.0
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

first a big thanks for the new apt command and congratulation to version
1.0.

The colors in new apt command (especially yellow output) seems to be
made for black terminals. If you use white (or nearly white) terminals
the output is nearly invisible.

Could you please add to detect the background color or have it
configurable or both or at least use colors that are visible on black
and white backgrounds?

- -- Package-specific info:
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (600, 'oldstable'), (110, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13.2 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  debian-archive-keyring  2012.4
ii  gnupg                   1.4.16-1.1
ii  libapt-pkg4.12          0.9.16.1
ii  libc6                   2.18-4
ii  libgcc1                 1:4.8.2-18
ii  libstdc++6              4.8.2-18

apt recommends no packages.

Versions of packages apt suggests:
ii  apt-doc                      0.9.16.1
pn  aptitude | synaptic | wajig  <none>
ii  dpkg-dev                     1.17.6
ii  python-apt                   0.9.3.4

- -- no debconf information

- -- 
Klaus Ethgen                              http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.de>
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJTPtm9AAoJEKZ8CrGAGfasWwML/039bzjTZNY0yH705D3DdCR8
E09Tto/FB1wQ6XSfcEXAhO7MwSCJ8OuL8E7s9b5Y/2EbZUd6y6FpYxV5kDtp2AKh
PYtE+d3/mxXb3iBl5DdmIJbQRI7uP2tCP6x/qV7g+XLJxrjK/qIhRBF3MmWeisD7
fWIqNSmbBABIoOEOJHjadMnFNZiRnqo0TAnhrkUQZiGbKrY9Y2bLCvxObRooe28P
4wZlqA8pD3te9A0xJTEInUYvXbZBojUIYhbeB6R1e7xb+HQHjpvIEqAAlyoyeOfB
GTjrBnxo3ahrLDcRJEyPOwcbitZi5cjHd5NZKzlEdSVtyzvCKnqX5LFcJrddj9TM
iIOKwXuuFIMwIVnnZYZuEfnzhMCsKhBWfH1BZBPTrnzrNhmXwmbmEHqPiBKM6QJE
sFvT40Adz4YirZNeiCUix4VnKmxFMOu7Ez6zKI6saymQQ54wCbFaypAr6A53E3GG
gAMT/9CDR8uEHDcxS4uLS9suy2M+4WaNGR9HklV+uA==
=ecbN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: