[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#510160: marked as done (update doubled download?)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:23:56 +0100
with message-id <20140211212356.GE5697@crossbow>
and subject line Re: apt appears to download pdiffs repeatedly
has caused the Debian Bug report #372504,
regarding update doubled download?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
372504: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=372504
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.19+b1
Severity: wishlist

Guessing this is an apt problem, not aptitude 0.4.11.11-1.

Why is
1) several entries repeated twice or thrice?
2) the final "Fetched 2607kB" nowhere near a total of the individual entries?

# aptitude update
Get:1 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid Release.gpg [189B]
Get:2 http://pkg-fso.alioth.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [189B]
Get:3 http://ftp.tw.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [197B]
Hit http://moblock-deb.sourceforge.net sid Release.gpg
Get:4 http://pkg-fso.alioth.debian.org unstable Release [3021B]
Get:5 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid Release [80.6kB]
Hit http://moblock-deb.sourceforge.net sid Release
Ign http://moblock-deb.sourceforge.net sid/main Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://pkg-fso.alioth.debian.org unstable/main Packages/DiffIndex
Hit http://moblock-deb.sourceforge.net sid/main Packages
Ign http://pkg-fso.alioth.debian.org unstable/main Packages
Get:6 http://ftp.tw.debian.org unstable Release [13.2kB]
Hit http://pkg-fso.alioth.debian.org unstable/main Packages
Get:7 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/main Packages/DiffIndex [2038B]
Get:8 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/contrib Packages/DiffIndex [2023B]
Get:9 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/non-free Packages/DiffIndex [2023B]
Ign http://ftp.tw.debian.org unstable/main Packages/DiffIndex
Get:10 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/main Packages [5706kB]
Get:11 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/main Packages [5706kB]
Get:12 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/contrib 2008-12-27-2014.19.pdiff [231B]
Get:13 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/non-free 2008-12-25-2024.03.pdiff [31B]
Get:14 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/contrib 2008-12-27-2014.19.pdiff [231B]
Get:15 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/contrib 2008-12-27-2014.19.pdiff [231B]
Get:16 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/non-free 2008-12-25-2024.03.pdiff [31B]
Get:17 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/non-free 2008-12-25-2024.03.pdiff [31B]
Get:18 http://ftp.tw.debian.org unstable/main Packages [62.7kB]
Get:19 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/contrib 2008-12-28-1428.55.pdiff [1255B]
Get:20 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/contrib 2008-12-28-1428.55.pdiff [1255B]
Get:21 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/contrib 2008-12-28-1428.55.pdiff [1255B]
Get:22 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/non-free 2008-12-26-2011.10.pdiff [1462B]
Get:23 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/non-free 2008-12-26-2011.10.pdiff [1462B]
Get:24 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/non-free 2008-12-26-2011.10.pdiff [1462B]
Fetched 2607kB in 5min50s (7447B/s)
Reading package lists...

# cat sources.list
deb http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian-multimedia/ unstable main
deb http://pkg-fso.alioth.debian.org/debian unstable main

# cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10jidanni
APT::Cache::AllVersions false;
APT::Clean-Installed false;
APT::Get::Purge true;
APT::Install-Recommends false;
Aptitude::CmdLine::Always-Prompt true;
Aptitude::Purge-Unused true;

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.9.14.3~exp1

Hi,

apt version 0.9.14.3~exp1 changed rred handling "completely" (at least
by default), so its a) passing by a lot faster and b) each pdiff is only
listed once (expect the last one) so it behaves like status reports for
other files in the mix. Nobody complained about those, so that display
seems to be "good enough".

See also my other message in this bug-group:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605873#10

In the end, the propose of this display isn't to show all freaking
details about what happens but a birdseye view just so that an observer
can see that "something" happens…


Best regards

David Kalnischkies

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: