Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:23:56 +0100 with message-id <20140211212356.GE5697@crossbow> and subject line Re: apt appears to download pdiffs repeatedly has caused the Debian Bug report #372504, regarding apt appears to download pdiffs repeatedly to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 372504: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=372504 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: apt appears to download pdiffs repeatedly
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:36:56 -0400
- Message-id: <20060609183655.10867.79982.reportbug@caradoc-internal.them.org>
Package: apt Version: 0.6.44.1 Severity: normal I find it hard to believe that this hasn't been reported already, but I couldn't find it anywhere... my "aptitude update" has looked like this since pdiff support was turned on: Get:38 2006-06-04-1349.29.pdiff [248B] Get:39 2006-06-04-1349.29.pdiff [248B] Get:40 2006-06-04-1349.29.pdiff [248B] Get:41 2006-06-05-1427.58.pdiff [898B] Get:42 2006-06-05-1427.58.pdiff [898B] Get:43 2006-06-05-1427.58.pdiff [898B] Get:44 2006-06-04-1349.29.pdiff [15.1kB] Get:45 2006-06-04-1349.29.pdiff [15.1kB] Get:46 2006-06-04-1349.29.pdiff [15.1kB] I don't know whether it's actually making an http request for each one of those files three times, but it definitely claims to. -- Package-specific info: -- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) -- -- /etc/apt/sources.list -- #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r0a _Sarge_ - Official amd64 Binary-1 (20050613)]/ unstable contrib main deb http://caradoc.them.org:3142/security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib ## AMD64 archive - currently flaky - 20050903 #deb http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ unstable main contrib #deb-src http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ unstable main contrib ## AMD64 archive #deb http://mirror.espri.arizona.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ unstable main contrib #deb-src http://mirror.espri.arizona.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ unstable main contrib # AMD64 in the main archive! deb http://caradoc.them.org:3142/debian-mirror.mirror.umn.edu/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free deb-src http://caradoc.them.org:3142/debian-mirror.mirror.umn.edu/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free # Java (Blackdown) deb ftp://ftp.tux.org/java/debian/ sarge non-free # Mplayer (Christian Marillat's packages) #deb http://cyberspace.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main deb http://caradoc.them.org:3142/spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-rc2 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages apt depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.1.0-4 GCC support library ii libstdc++6 4.1.0-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 Versions of packages apt recommends: ii debian-archive-keyring 2006.01.18 GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 372504-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: apt appears to download pdiffs repeatedly
- From: David Kalnischkies <david@kalnischkies.de>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:23:56 +0100
- Message-id: <20140211212356.GE5697@crossbow>
Version: 0.9.14.3~exp1 Hi, apt version 0.9.14.3~exp1 changed rred handling "completely" (at least by default), so its a) passing by a lot faster and b) each pdiff is only listed once (expect the last one) so it behaves like status reports for other files in the mix. Nobody complained about those, so that display seems to be "good enough". See also my other message in this bug-group: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605873#10 In the end, the propose of this display isn't to show all freaking details about what happens but a birdseye view just so that an observer can see that "something" happens… Best regards David KalnischkiesAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---