Bug#733489: python-apt: Improve 'Dependency' and 'BaseDependency' to get target package versions that satisfy dependencies
- To: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>, 733489@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#733489: python-apt: Improve 'Dependency' and 'BaseDependency' to get target package versions that satisfy dependencies
- From: Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 19:15:37 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20140104181537.GN3852@bod>
- Reply-to: Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>, 733489@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20131231235348.GA1800@debian.org>
- References: <20131229110618.7902.57274.reportbug@black-box> <20131231012433.GA29008@debian.org> <20131231115920.GH3852@bod> <52C2B403.4010705@5challer.de> <20131231220615.GJ3852@bod> <20131231235348.GA1800@debian.org>
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:58:17PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:06:15PM +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
[..]
> You really need to include the original copyright statement and the license
> here, otherwise you violate the license. If the original code does not
> include the license or a copyright statement above it, it might not be
> distributable at all, as the license clearly says:
>
> The *above* copyright notice and *this permission notice* shall be included in
> all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
>
> (I just added some emphasis)
>
> I'd even say that including the copyright notice *below* the license terms
> is wrong, as the license clearly says *above*. But not including them is
> definitely wrong.
>
> We don't want legal issues.
Indeed! The header was cargo-culted from the update-manager
test_pyflakes.py but I rewrote the file for python-apt completely so
we are clean here (and I fixed the comment). I will followup with the
update-manager test too.
Cheers,
Michael
Reply to: