Re: zlib1g-dev: version 1:1.2.7.dfsg-7 requires an uninstallable dependency (zlib1g (= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-4))
- To: Sophoklis Goumas <olspookishmagus@gmail.com>
- Cc: 673939@bugs.debian.org, apt@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: zlib1g-dev: version 1:1.2.7.dfsg-7 requires an uninstallable dependency (zlib1g (= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-4))
- From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 09:36:21 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120522143621.GA6858@burratino>
- In-reply-to: <CAC2zJ1toXGhj9L59spWUTA5Enir5W=_mtxMahLn47Aw8Se_gtA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20120522071402.7912.8821.reportbug@sojourn.lan> <20120522072317.GD4486@burratino> <CAC2zJ1sxXZbzNKCbw2wiyL68Lhuk0Mvvq3tG4BxSBmz9LR6How@mail.gmail.com> <20120522135419.GA6031@burratino> <CAC2zJ1sqa8r22vEHR9gXpP10+mQQ5JRjPYhJW23FWB+=cwmgHg@mail.gmail.com> <20120522142029.GB6660@burratino> <CAC2zJ1toXGhj9L59spWUTA5Enir5W=_mtxMahLn47Aw8Se_gtA@mail.gmail.com>
Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> I've already answered that:
>> Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
>>> ...
>>> No I did not install zlib 1:1.2.7.dfsg-7 "by hand".
>>> ...
>
> By not "by hand" I mean not by using dpkg as you've mentioned.
> But by "apt-get install zlib1g zlib1g-dev zlib1-dbg" I guess.
Ok, thanks. I'm cc-ing the apt maintainers in case they have
ideas for debugging this.
apt maintainers: when Sophoklis tried a dist-upgrade, he got the
following result:
# apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade
...
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
zlib1g-dbg : Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-4) but 1:1.2.7.dfsg-7 is installed
zlib1g-dev : Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-4) but 1:1.2.7.dfsg-7 is installed
E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.
zlib1g-dev and zlib1g are "Architecture: any" binary packages from
the same source package, and zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.7.dfsg-7 from the
archive depends on zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-7, not -4. Any suggestions
to help track this down?
Sophoklis: /var/log/apt/term.log, /var/log/dpkg.log, and "apt-cache
policy zlib1g zlib1g-dev" may help piece the story together.
Sorry for the fuss.
Jonathan
Reply to: