Bug#669410: german apt-get(8) manpage: --only-upgrade repeats --no-upgrade's description
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.10.3+squeeze1
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
>From apt-get(8):
--no-upgrade
Kein Upgrade von Paketen durchführen; Wenn es zusammen
mit install benutzt wird, wird no-upgrade auf der
Befehlszeile ein Upgrade von Paketen verhindern, wenn sie
bereits installiert sind. Konfigurationselement:
APT::Get::Upgrade.
--only-upgrade
Kein Upgrade von Paketen durchführen; Wenn es zusammen
mit install benutzt wird, wird only-upgrade auf der
Befehlszeile ein Upgrade von Paketen verhindern, wenn sie
bereits installiert sind. Konfigurationselement:
APT::Get::Only-Upgrade.
Obviously only the option itself and it's Configuration Item differ.
I would provide a translation if the english manpage wouldn't have
almost the same bug.
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/apt/preferences --
-- (/etc/apt/sources.list present, but not submitted) --
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii debian-archive-keyring 2010.08.28 GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a
ii gnupg 1.4.10-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
ii libc6 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:4.4.5-8 GCC support library
ii libstdc++6 4.4.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime
apt recommends no packages.
Versions of packages apt suggests:
pn apt-doc <none> (no description available)
ii aptitude 0.6.3-3.2+squeeze1 terminal-based package manager (te
ii bzip2 1.0.5-6+squeeze1 high-quality block-sorting file co
pn dpkg-dev <none> (no description available)
ii lzma 4.43-14 Compression method of 7z format in
ii python-apt 0.7.100.1+squeeze1 Python interface to libapt-pkg
-- no debconf information
Reply to: