Re: binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org, deity@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same
From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 14:11:03 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20120407121103.GI22243@radis.cristau.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120407120718.GA26700@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 20120407114127.GA25061@debian.org> <[🔎] 1333792587.24386.79.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> <[🔎] 20120407120718.GA26700@debian.org>

On Sat, Apr  7, 2012 at 12:15:58 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:

> Discussion in Bug#595139 led to the conclusion that packages which are
> Multi-arch: same must not be binNMUed (or in fact, binNMUed on all
> architectures).
> 
I very much disagree with that "conclusion".

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>

References:
- binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same
  - From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>
- Re: binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Re: binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same
  - From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same
Next by Date: Processed: tagging 567765
Previous by thread: Re: binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same
Next by thread: Re: binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread