[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#645970: Depends: python2.7 | python2.6 and Suggest: python2.6, is this intended?



Package: python-apt
Version: 0.8.1
Severity: minor

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Dear Maintainer,

Today I found that python-apt depends on python2.7 | python2.6,
and AFAIK it works without problem with python2.7 without python2.6.

However, this package suggests only python2.6.
Is this an intended behavior? If so, please just close this bug.

Best regards,
- -- 
Ryo IGARASHI, Ph.D.
rigarash@gmail.com

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages python-apt depends on:
ii  apt [libapt-pkg4.10]        0.8.15.9  
ii  apt-utils [libapt-inst1.2]  0.8.15.9  
ii  libc6                       2.13-21   
ii  libgcc1                     1:4.6.1-15
ii  libstdc++6                  4.6.1-15  
ii  python                      2.7.2-9   
ii  python-apt-common           0.8.1     
ii  python2.7                   2.7.2-7   

Versions of packages python-apt recommends:
pn  iso-codes    3.29-1
pn  lsb-release  3.2-28
pn  python2.6    <none>

Versions of packages python-apt suggests:
pn  python-apt-dbg  <none>  
pn  python-apt-doc  <none>  
pn  python-gtk2     2.24.0-2
pn  python-vte      <none>  

- -- no debconf information

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=hfcj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: