[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#611568: marked as done (apt-mark depends on python-apt)



Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:22:29 +0100
with message-id <1296415349.22350.4.camel@jak-thinkpad>
and subject line Re: Bug#611568: apt-mark depends on python-apt
has caused the Debian Bug report #611568,
regarding apt-mark depends on python-apt
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
611568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611568
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.10
Severity: minor

apt-mark requires python-apt to run. But python-apt is only suggested.
I think apt should depend on python-apt because I don't see the point in
including a non-working tool in a package.

If a working apt-mark is only suggested, then, maybe apt-mark should
belong to another package that apt would suggest.

Regards,
Celelibi

-- Package-specific info:

-- (/etc/apt/preferences present, but not submitted) --


-- (/etc/apt/sources.list present, but not submitted) --


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (995, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.36 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  debian-archive-keyring  2010.08.28       GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a
ii  gnupg                   1.4.10-4         GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
ii  libc6                   2.11.2-9         Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libgcc1                 1:4.4.5-8        GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6              4.4.5-8          The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  zlib1g                  1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime

apt recommends no packages.

Versions of packages apt suggests:
pn  apt-doc                       <none>     (no description available)
pn  aptitude | synaptic | wajig   <none>     (no description available)
ii  bzip2                         1.0.5-6    high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  dpkg-dev                      1.15.8.8   Debian package development tools
ii  lzma                          4.43-14    Compression method of 7z format in
ii  python-apt                    0.7.100.1  Python interface to libapt-pkg

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On So, 2011-01-30 at 19:43 +0100, Celelibi wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.8.10
> Severity: minor
> 
> apt-mark requires python-apt to run. But python-apt is only suggested.
> I think apt should depend on python-apt because I don't see the point in
> including a non-working tool in a package.
> 
> If a working apt-mark is only suggested, then, maybe apt-mark should
> belong to another package that apt would suggest.

Thank you for your bug report, but you do not need apt-mark, use apt-get
{un,}markauto and apt-cache showauto instead. apt-mark is deprecated and
may be removed in future versions of apt. We won't split it out, and we
won't introduce cyclic dependencies for a deprecated script.

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.




--- End Message ---

Reply to: