Re: [APT2] Initial public push
On Mi, 2010-08-11 at 21:32 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> Julian,
>
> > Accessor functions: APT:no, APT2:yes (completely opaque), Cupt:no
> > Designed as library: APT:yes, APT2:yes, Cupt:no
> > Designed for multiple distributions: APT:alongtimeago, APT2:yes, Cupt:no
> FWIW, these three for Cupt are wrong, Cupt is, basically, a library and a
> console front-end to it.
The last time I looked at your C++ tree, there were no accessor
functions and d-pointers, but members listed in public headers.
And unless I have missed something, you are not designing with non-dpkg
distributions in mind (which I meant with multiple distributions).
I may be wrong about the library thing, though.
>
> > [1] cupt uses regular expressions a lot more; Eugene, could you
> > re-license your regular expressions as LGPL-2.1+, so we can share them
> > where appropriate?
>
> No, I put the license intentionally and don't want to change it (at least, now).
OK, I was just asking. I should already have regexes for everything. The
problem with regexes is just that they can look very similar, even if
not copied (I hate copies anyway).
--
Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member
See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.
Reply to: