[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#583502: Processed: retitle 583502 to apt generates incorrect index uris



reassign 583502 apt-offline
retitle "cycle through supported compression formats for indexes"
thanks


On Saturday 29 May 2010 12:13:03 David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Why? The archives supports also gzip and APT will fallback to
> it if bz2 and lzma is not available. I was told that at least a few
> people prefer gzip over bz2 as unpack of bz2 is slow compared
> to gzip which is notable on slow machines (and architectures),
> so why adding additional trouble for them by depending on
> bzip2 which is absolutely not strictly needed?
> 
> And this wouldn't help anything anyway. If a (third party) archive
> does only serve gz compressed files APT would still say in
> --print-uris that it will download bzip2 as it doesn't know it
> beforehand.
> It can only know that after downloading the Release file…


Okay!! Thanks for explaining. The manpage seems to be favoring the following 
order by default:
bzip2: lzma: gzip

In that case, the bug report is valid against apt-offline and I should be doing 
the same thing of trying all these 3 formats because a mix of source 
repositories could be present, serving different formats.


-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: