[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#578385: closed by Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> (Re: Bug#578385: wrong dependency information about libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.8)



On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:25:38PM +0530, Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System said on Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:15:08PM +0000,:
> 
>  > It's experimental, not a bug.
> 
> I now have only testing in my sources.list, and aptitude is still uninstallable. 
You still have apt from experimental installed which provides
libapt-pkg4.9 and not libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.8. Since downgrades
are not supported, there is no way to install aptitude.

> 
> And there is some problem with dependency information somewhere - apt
> provides the libapt-pkg-libc6Whatever package; and it is installed;
> but still aptitude refuses to install. I do not think that being in
> experimental is a reason for apt/dpkg to ignore correctly declared
> dependency information in packages. 
It does not ignore anything.


> 
> Additionally, 
> 
> Package libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.8 is a virtual package provided by:
> You should explicitly select one to install.
> 
> is an unexpected / incomplete message; I think a a package SHOULD be
> named here when the user has given apt* wrong / inadequate names of
> packages to be installed.
That's probably a (minor) bug.

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.

Attachment: pgpSZrHCyJY6V.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: