Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 08:33:49PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >> Cupt uniquely identifies the version entry by the pair (package_name, >> version). Hence, I disagree with adding some additional 'id's or something to >> the spec, it's ugly and not necessary IMO. > > So, how does cupt currently handle locally installed packages which > might have been rebuilt by users (which forgot to change the version > number)? If they are binary equivalent, they are merged. Otherwise non-local packages are thrown out with a warning. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature