Bug#178854: marked as done ([methods/http] Should apt's HTTP engine follow 302 redirects?)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:06:16 +0200
with message-id <20090727090616.GA24899@tas>
and subject line Re: Bug#479350: apt-get does not follow redirects over http
has caused the Debian Bug report #479350,
regarding [methods/http] Should apt's HTTP engine follow 302 redirects?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
479350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479350
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: apt: Should apt's HTTP engine follow 302 redirects?
- From: Luke Reeves <lreeves@members.fsf.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:56:17 -0500
- Message-id: <E18dgWa-0000KF-00@continuity>
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: wishlist
This would make it easier to load balance existing Deb repositories, and
I've noticed that the download.kde.org source appears to use this. Just
an idea.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:19:07PM +0100, David Greaves wrote:
> It appears there is a patch for this bug:
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/apt/ubuntu/revision/1688
>
> Would it be reasonable to apply it to Debian's apt?
That patch got applied to 0.7.21 (currently in debian/testing).
Cheers,
Michael
> David
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deity-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--- End Message ---
Reply to: