Yann Dirson wrote: > Hi Eugene, Hello Yann, > Given the details in which Daniel went with his reply, it would seem > adequate to me to get more detailed information about *why* this > behavior is intended, Manual intervention needed when removing required packages. Sounds good for me. > what to do about the apparently too large number > of required packages Very few library packages are 'required'. > and especially about "required" library > packages. If this behaviour is to be kept, it may be eg. that libary > packages should be forbidden as "required" (in which case this > bugreport should be reassigned to -policy) ? Yes, reassigning to debian-policy maybe a good choice now. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com Ukrainian C++ developer, Debian APT contributor
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature