package apt tags 501274 +unreproducible thanks Kurt Roeckx wrote: > reassign 501274 apt > thanks > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:05:19PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >> package apt >> reassign 501274 buildd.debian.org >> thanks >> >> Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >>> I just generated it for the apt-cache binary. I didn't install the >>> rebuild at all so it needs to have picked up the system's library, and >>> the rebuild doesn't crash so I guess the library is not to being held >>> responsible. >>> >>> Find them attached, system-apt-cache.gz is the installed binary that >>> segfaults on me (0.7.18 of apt is installed), rebuilt-apt-cache.gz is >>> the one from my rebuild from the same source. >> Thanks, I've looked into. Unfortunately, diff covers almost all the disassemble, can't do >> anything more. >> >> In this moment I believe that it's build problem, so I am reassigning this bug to >> buildd.debian.org (at least, temporarily). > > Even if rebuilding the package fixes it, I don't see any good reason to > assign this bug to the buildd package. It's more likely that this is > either a bug in the package or one of it's (build) dependencies. > > If this is a powerpc specific issue, I suggest you contact the powerpc > list about it. I have no idea. CC'ing this letter to powerpc list and powerpc buildd team. > The only case I can think of that a bug might be assigned to the buildd > package is that one of the buildds itself is broken. And I see no sign > of this. I tend to disagree, but I understand that I have no proofs. Marked 'unreproducible'. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com Ukrainian C++ developer, Debian APT contributor
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature