[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#122932: marked as done (Should apt-utils have standard, required, important or base priority?)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:57:08 +0200
with message-id <49198124.7020401@gmail.com>
and subject line closing #89060
has caused the Debian Bug report #89060,
regarding Should apt-utils have standard, required, important or base priority?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
89060: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=89060
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apt-utils
Version : 0.5.4

The CD building scripts (debian-cd) will automatically install
packages with priority standard, required, important or packages in
section base.  The apt-utils package in Woody do not fit into any of
these categories.  The section is admin and the priority is optional.

I suggest changing the priority or the section of apt-utils to make
sure it is installed by default on the first CD.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
I assume this bug can be closed, because debconf recommends apt-utils now.
As usually, reopen if any objections exist.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: