[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#400874: marked as done (apt-get: glibc detected: double free or corruption)

Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:32:03 +0000
with message-id <E1GrYWp-0002Vk-65@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#400874: fixed in apt 0.6.46.3-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apt
Severity: grave
Version: 0.6.46.2

Hi,

on my freshly installed etch amd64-system, I get this error now:

aba@auxo:~$ apt-get source php-imagick
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x00000000005b0980 ***
Aborted

The same happens with apt-get source bash. My /etc/apt/sources.list
contains:
deb http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian etch main
deb-src http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian etch main
deb-src http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian sid main

Any hints for me?


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: apt
Source-Version: 0.6.46.3-0.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-doc_0.6.46.3-0.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt-doc_0.6.46.3-0.1_all.deb
apt_0.6.46.3-0.1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.6.46.3-0.1.dsc
apt_0.6.46.3-0.1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.6.46.3-0.1.tar.gz
libapt-pkg-doc_0.6.46.3-0.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/apt/libapt-pkg-doc_0.6.46.3-0.1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 400874@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> (supplier of updated apt package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  5 Dec 2006 10:34:56 +0000
Source: apt
Binary: apt-utils libapt-pkg-doc libapt-pkg-dev apt-doc apt
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6.46.3-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Description: 
 apt        - Advanced front-end for dpkg
 apt-doc    - Documentation for APT
 apt-utils  - APT utility programs
 libapt-pkg-dev - Development files for APT's libapt-pkg and libapt-inst
 libapt-pkg-doc - Documentation for APT development
Closes: 400874 401017 401114
Changes: 
 apt (0.6.46.3-0.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload with permission of Michael Vogt.
   * Fix segfault at apt-get source. Closes: #400874
   * Add apt-key update in postinst, so that debian-archive-keyring doesn't
     need to depend on apt >= 0.6. Closes: #401114
   * Don't double-queue pdiff files. Closes: #401017
Files: 
 29db8a90c9c9a579693f5224189239df 796 admin important apt_0.6.46.3-0.1.dsc
 6884258841c3ef4294e441694fc26a2d 1793085 admin important apt_0.6.46.3-0.1.tar.gz
 704ace660caf4bc69adf670b8a9f3f5f 91384 doc optional apt-doc_0.6.46.3-0.1_all.deb
 5b88479ea37cf572fb224f5b4a1f52e4 112860 doc optional libapt-pkg-doc_0.6.46.3-0.1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFdVS3mdOZoew2oYURAkvdAKCMaDOQ1Xa7+rZ4d4P1/kn541dCHACdF3d2
Wg9DzIhwvArv8BUuWFOeCYE=
=tt6b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: