[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#376817: confirmation



On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:42:31AM +1200, Mark Robinson wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:58:20AM +1200, Mark Robinson wrote:
> >>Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:51:42AM +1200, Mark Robinson wrote:
> >>>>I have several times seen it flag MD5SUM errors where the expected 
> >>>>MD5SUM and that computed are identical.
> >>>I would be interested to see verbatim copies of such errors.
> >>>>Computed MD5: 79d0311df375b8fe66ba0a97c5b1b069  Expected MD5: 
> >>>>79d0311df375b8fe66ba0a97c5b1b069
> >
> >These don't match.
> 
> eh ?
> 
> >>>> Computed MD5: 79d0311df375b8fe66ba0a97c5b1b069  Expected MD5:
> >>>>               79d0311df375b8fe66ba0a97c5b1b069

That one isn't a failure; in verbose mode, it prints the MD5 in every case.

-- 
 - mdz



Reply to: