[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#345956: marked as done (misleading apt-get warning message from apt-key)

Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 13:38:13 -0400
with message-id <20060530173813.GA16735@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43
Severity: minor

when running apt-get update
I have the following warning/error message:
"W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.debian.org unstable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems"

This suggestion, about running apt-get update is misleading, because it
doesn't fix anything. There should be some message, about apt-key or about
keyring some link to manual.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-9    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                       1:4.0.2-5  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6                    4.0.2-5    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

apt recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.6.43.1

I don't think this bug needs to remain open, like I said before. If you
disagree, feel free to reopen it.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: