--- Begin Message ---
- To: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Subject: Re: Bug#325983: g++: unmet deps
- From: beau <phaedral@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 09:35:39 -0400
- Message-id: <95a88306050901063520c5319e@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <17174.65176.473204.366176@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
- References: <E1EAeTA-00014c-Ll@localhost.localdomain> <17174.58015.860738.449481@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <95a88306050901053533422fde@mail.gmail.com> <17174.63229.571897.702634@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <95a8830605090105467620bc7b@mail.gmail.com> <17174.65176.473204.366176@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On 9/1/05, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote: > Please try to be a little bit friendlier to the apt maintainers. You have got to be kidding. You insult me with "works for me," insult me again with "the bug list isn't a help desk," and then ask me to be friendlier with the maintainers. I didn't ask for fucking help, I reported a fucking problem---as instructed by the output of your installer, and only *after* trying to confirm at #debian that I wasn't sending something bogus. If *you* want to submit a bug report on apt, fine. I don't see where it's an apt problem that g++ gets a "broken packages" error on a fresh stable netinstall. Are you saying apt is getting the dependencies wrong? How the hell am I supposed to know that? I only consider the possibility because the g++ maintainer who got the bug report told me so. Isn't that the whole fucking point of sending bugs to maintainers? Hey, maybe I'm just mean, or maybe I've lurked at #debian too long and expect you guys to be able to take the disrespect you so gladly dish out. It works for me. -- Robert Thomas ("beau") Hayes Link (c)2005ISR http://www.semanticrestructuring.com/ Discussion, News and Chat at http://lawboards.semanticrestructuring.com/ "In dreams we are not tethered to earthly limitations"---G.T.Snail
--- End Message ---