[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#316262: marked as done (apt: Local repository and Release.gpg)



Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2005 11:47:00 +0200
with message-id <20050703094700.GX30164@top.ping.de>
and subject line Bug#316262: apt: Local repository and Release.gpg
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2005 18:41:14 +0000
>From riesebie@lxtec.de Wed Jun 29 11:41:14 2005
Return-path: <riesebie@lxtec.de>
Received: from h01.hostsharing.net (pima.hostsharing.net) [212.42.230.152] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DnhUn-0005du-00; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:41:14 -0700
Received: from mail.home.lxtec.de (p549EC3B9.dip.t-dialin.net [84.158.195.185])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pima.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A5CE1C2680; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:41:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by mail.home.lxtec.de with esmtp (Exim 4.51 1 (LXTEC))
	id 1DnhUk-0003BW-MT; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:41:10 +0200
Received: from mail.home.lxtec.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (baumbart [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 12189-01; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:41:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from frodo.home.lxtec.de ([192.168.200.202])
	by mail.home.lxtec.de with esmtps (Exim 4.51 1 (LXTEC))
	id 1DnhUg-0003BN-D7; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:41:06 +0200
Received: from riesebie by frodo.home.lxtec.de with local (Exim 4.51)
	id 1DnhUg-0002qL-7A; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:41:06 +0200
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:41:06 +0200
From: Elimar Riesebieter <riesebie@lxtec.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apt: Local repository and Release.gpg
Message-ID: <20050629184106.GA10870@frodo.home.lxtec.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at home.lxtec.de
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: apt
Version: 0.6.38
Severity: normal



-- Package-specific info:

-- apt-config dump --

APT "";
APT::Architecture "i386";
APT::Build-Essential "";
APT::Build-Essential:: "build-essential";
APT::Default-Release "unstable";
APT::Get "";
APT::Get::Show-Upgraded "yes";
Dir "/";
Dir::State "var/lib/apt/";
Dir::State::lists "lists/";
Dir::State::cdroms "cdroms.list";
Dir::State::userstatus "status.user";
Dir::State::status "/var/lib/dpkg/status";
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt/";
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
Dir::Etc "etc/apt/";
Dir::Etc::sourcelist "sources.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorlist "vendors.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorparts "vendors.list.d";
Dir::Etc::main "apt.conf";
Dir::Etc::parts "apt.conf.d";
Dir::Etc::preferences "preferences";
Dir::Bin "";
Dir::Bin::methods "/usr/lib/apt/methods";
Dir::Bin::dpkg "/usr/bin/dpkg";
DPkg "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true";
DPkg::Post-Invoke "";
DPkg::Post-Invoke:: "if [ -x /usr/bin/debsums ]; then /usr/bin/debsums --ge=
nerate=3Dnocheck -sp /var/cache/apt/archives; fi";
DPkg::Post-Invoke:: "if [ -x /usr/sbin/localepurge ] && [ $(ps w -p $PPID |=
 grep -c remove) !=3D 1 ]; then /usr/sbin/localepurge; else exit 0; fi";

-- /etc/apt/preferences --

Package: *
Pin: release a=3Dlxtec
Pin-Priority: 990

-- (/etc/apt/sources.list present, but not submitted) --


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-frodo
Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE@euro (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii  libgcc1                     1:4.0.0-11   GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.6-7    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

apt recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

My configuration is to ask for gpg keys. This is done for the official deb
sorces. But since 0.6.38 my Release file from my local builds is ignored. I
singed the Release to Release.gpg: both are ignored. Ok, 'apt-key add my ke=
yid'
was done before and 'apt-key list' shows my key.

I didn't found any hint in apt-doc or libapt-pkg-doc :(

Ciao

Elimar

--=20
  Never make anything simple and efficient when a way=20
  can be found to make it complex and wonderful ;-)

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCwutC3Ig8bsVPf7ARArdNAJ9sbPn/L7oYV8kaWnj5sRUrlG9ANgCgmsoG
AcYeDWegUBtTYlz8MaznGAU=
=Jemy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 316262-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 09:48:44 +0000
>From sir.mvo@gmx.de Sun Jul 03 02:48:44 2005
Return-path: <sir.mvo@gmx.de>
Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Dp15f-0006sV-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 02:48:44 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Jul 2005 09:48:11 -0000
Received: from ip181.135.1511I-CUD12K-01.ish.de (EHLO top.ping.de) [62.143.135.181]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 03 Jul 2005 11:48:11 +0200
X-Authenticated: #18895133
Received: by top.ping.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A34316F395; Sun,  3 Jul 2005 11:47:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 11:47:00 +0200
From: Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>
To: 316262-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#316262: apt: Local repository and Release.gpg
Message-ID: <20050703094700.GX30164@top.ping.de>
References: <20050629184106.GA10870@frodo.home.lxtec.de> <20050629190838.GB19062@top.ping.de> <20050629193728.GB7381@frodo.home.lxtec.de> <20050630115741.GC20814@top.ping.de> <20050702204858.GF6660@aragorn.home.lxtec.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050702204858.GF6660@aragorn.home.lxtec.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: 316262-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 10:48:58PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 the mental interface of
> Michael Vogt told:
> 
> [...]
> > I haven't seen your sources.list and I haven't seen your archive
> > layout but the "Ign" means "ignoring". Apt just can't find a
> > Release.gpg file and so it does not check it. It looks like your
> > archive is not setup properly. 
> 
> You're right. Please close that bug.

Good to hear that it works now for you.

I close this bug now.
 
Cheeers,
 Michael

-- 
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo



Reply to: