[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#225834: apt: Pinning does not seem to work in experimental



tags 225834 experimental
thanks

On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:20:18AM +0100, Philipp Weis wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.9
> Severity: normal

Please use the 'experimental' tag as requested on debian-devel.

> I just upgraded from apt 0.5.14 to the new apt in experimental. Now
> pinning does not seem to work any longer. Maybe I'm missing something, but
> my configuration worked perferctly with 0.5.14 and I can't figure out why
> it should not work with the new version.

Are all of the Release files present and downloaded correctly?  Pinning
relies on these files.

What does "apt-cache -o Debug::pkgPolicy=yes ..." say?  Also send output
from apt-get update and apt-get --print-uris update.

> All packages are assigned their standard priorities, e.g. 
> 
> pweis@zaphod:~$ apt-cache policy apt
> apt:
>   Installed: 0.6.9
>   Candidate: 0.6.9
>   Version Table:
>  *** 0.6.9 0
>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>      0.6.8 0
>         500 http://marvin experimental/main Packages
>         500 http://ftp.de.debian.org experimental/main Packages
>         500 http://ftp2.de.debian.org experimental/main Packages

>      0.5.17 0
>         500 http://marvin unstable/main Packages
>         500 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main Packages
>         500 http://ftp2.de.debian.org unstable/main Packages
>      0.5.14 0
>         500 http://marvin sarge/main Packages
>         500 http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages
>         500 http://ftp2.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages
>      0.5.4 0
>         500 http://ftp.de.debian.org woody/main Packages
>         500 http://ftp2.de.debian.org woody/main Packages

I wouldn't be _entirely_ surprised if release pins aren't working exactly
right in 0.6 yet, but I'm rather surprised that the automatic pinning for
experimental isn't working.  That seems to imply that the Release file isn't
being properly retrieved or read.

-- 
 - mdz



Reply to: