On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:22:30AM +0200, Koblinger Egmont wrote: > Okay, it seems that we misunderstand each other :-)) > > Could you please explain to me what you mean by "... by some means which > does not break the rule that shorter version numbers are smaller"? I can't > understand this. It was a comment on dpkg's notion of '"', and had nothing to do with your patch, which seems to match dpkg's interpretation (and passes the tests in versiontest.cc). -- - mdz