Bug#207400: Progeny apt changes and other apt stuff
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:21:53PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 14:37, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Thanks for the summary. If it's not too much of a pain for you to separate
> > out the patches and file them in the BTS, that would be great. I'm trying
> > to merge a lot of apt stuff at the moment and it helps a ton to have smaller
> > patches to work with.
>
> OK. I'll do the SSL part as a complete patch, rather than a diff
> against Tomas's patch, and I'll try to split the others into separate
> patches.
Thanks, I appreciate it.
> Regarding Conectiva, I don't think a full merge is going to be possible in
> the short term, and I'm not convinced it's necessary even in the long
> term. Feature parity and compatibility are more important, I think.
I'd like to minimize the effort that both Conectiva and Debian will spend
keeping in sync. I don't want apt-rpm to remain a fork forever. I don't
think it is necessary to merge all of their changes in order to achieve
this, but there are some pieces that we may want (though it is hard to pick
them out at this point).
--
- mdz
Reply to: