[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#205997: marked as done (/usr/bin/apt-get: package's new versions ignored after failed config)



Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2003 00:53:43 -0400
with message-id <20030818045343.GX1361@alcor.net>
and subject line Bug#205997: /usr/bin/apt-get: package's new versions ignored after failed config
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2003 04:15:41 +0000
>From jidanni@jidanni.org Sun Aug 17 23:15:39 2003
Return-path: <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Received: from smtp1.apol.com.tw (smtp.apol.com.tw) [203.79.224.62] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19obQg-0008VM-00; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 23:15:38 -0500
Received: from debian (tc218-187-82-29.2-7.pl.apol.com.tw [218.187.82.29])
	by smtp.apol.com.tw (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B101040606
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:15:25 +0800 (CST)
Received: from jidanni by debian with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19oWg9-0001KN-9L; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:11:17 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5"
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: /usr/bin/apt-get: package's new versions ignored after failed config
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.22
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:11:17 +0800
Message-Id: <[🔎] E19oWg9-0001KN-9L@debian>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_30,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.9
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/apt-get

Consider the case of netbase 4.11, a package with a broken script that
fails configuration.

Then one does apt-get update and 4.13 is now the candidate as seen in
apt-cache policy.

However doing a
apt-get install
or
apt-get install most_anything
[other than apt-get install netbase (or probably its dependencies too)]
will still insist in trying to install 4.11.
-- Package-specific info:

-- apt-config dump --

APT "";
APT::Architecture "i386";
APT::Build-Essential "";
APT::Build-Essential:: "build-essential";
APT::Get "";
APT::Get::List-Cleanup "false";
APT::Cache-Limit "16777216";
Dir "/";
Dir::State "var/lib/apt/";
Dir::State::lists "lists/";
Dir::State::cdroms "cdroms.list";
Dir::State::userstatus "status.user";
Dir::State::status "/var/lib/dpkg/status";
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt/";
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
Dir::Etc "etc/apt/";
Dir::Etc::sourcelist "sources.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorlist "vendors.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorparts "vendors.list.d";
Dir::Etc::main "apt.conf";
Dir::Etc::parts "apt.conf.d";
Dir::Etc::preferences "preferences";
Dir::Bin "";
Dir::Bin::methods "/usr/lib/apt/methods";
Dir::Bin::dpkg "/usr/bin/dpkg";
DPkg "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges --apt || test $? -ne 10";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true";
DPkg::Tools "";
DPkg::Tools::Options "";
DPkg::Tools::Options::/usr/bin/apt-listchanges "";
DPkg::Tools::Options::/usr/bin/apt-listchanges::Version "2";

-- /etc/apt/sources.list --

deb     http://debian.linux.org.tw/debian        sid        main contrib non-free
deb     http://debian.linux.org.tw/debian-non-US sid/non-US main contrib non-free

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.21-1-k7 #2 Mon Jun 16 22:23:16 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                      2.3.2-2       GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                    1:3.3.2-0pre1 GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5                 1:3.3.1-0rc1  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 205997-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2003 04:53:47 +0000
>From mdz@csh.rit.edu Sun Aug 17 23:53:45 2003
Return-path: <mdz@csh.rit.edu>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19oc1Y-0002Cm-00; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 23:53:44 -0500
Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
	by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
	id 19oc1Y-0003Z5-00; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 00:53:44 -0400
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19oc1X-0000OM-00; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 00:53:43 -0400
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 00:53:43 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
To: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>, 205997-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#205997: /usr/bin/apt-get: package's new versions ignored after failed config
Message-ID: <20030818045343.GX1361@alcor.net>
References: <[🔎] E19oWg9-0001KN-9L@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E19oWg9-0001KN-9L@debian>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@alcor.net>
Delivered-To: 205997-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:11:17AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:

> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.9
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/bin/apt-get
> 
> Consider the case of netbase 4.11, a package with a broken script that
> fails configuration.
> 
> Then one does apt-get update and 4.13 is now the candidate as seen in
> apt-cache policy.

apt always tries to fix any broken packages on the system (or let you
specify a solution) before letting you try to install new ones.  This is a
feature.  It is not installing anything; it is only trying to configure the
package which was already unpacked on your system, and failed to configure
previously.

Did you consider copying and pasting the output showing exactly what apt was
doing, rather than trying to explain what you thought it was doing?  That
would have saved me the guesswork of figuring out what you were talking
about.

I am not going to provide technical support to you through the BTS.  Your
bug reports are not contributing to the development process.  So, please do
not file any more bug reports against apt.  If you have a question about why
apt is behaving a certain way, ask on debian-user@lists.debian.org.  Do not
file a bug report.  Is this clear?

-- 
 - mdz



Reply to: