[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#183390: marked as done (apt-get source doesn't check if package dpkg-dev is installed)



Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:42:29 -0400
with message-id <20030718134229.GT13924@alcor.net>
and subject line apt-get source doesn't check if package dpkg-dev is installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2003 14:22:01 +0000
>From jojo@infidyne.com Tue Mar 04 08:22:01 2003
Return-path: <jojo@infidyne.com>
Received: from (infidyne.com) [212.112.161.72] (qmailr)
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18qDIv-0006wA-00; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 08:22:01 -0600
Received: (qmail 20698 invoked by uid 1011); 4 Mar 2003 14:22:11 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 14:22:11 -0000
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:22:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Johannes Lundberg <jojo@infidyne.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: apt-get source doesn't check if package dpkg-dev is installed
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303041511180.20370-100000@equinox.infidyne.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 


Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4

apt-get source doesn't check if the package dpkg-dev is installed, prior
to running dpkg-source. Should be simple to fix.
Here is a transcript:

woody:/usr/src# apt-get source joe
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 217kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://ftp.se.debian.org woody/main joe 2.8-20 (dsc) [580B]
Get:2 http://ftp.se.debian.org woody/main joe 2.8-20 (tar) [194kB]
Get:3 http://ftp.se.debian.org woody/main joe 2.8-20 (diff) [23.0kB]
Fetched 3B in 0s (6B/s)
dpkg-source: not found
Unpack command 'dpkg-source -x joe_2.8-20.dsc' failed.
E: Child process failed


The system is running Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (woody) with latest updates,
and without package dpkg-dev installed.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 183390-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2003 13:42:34 +0000
>From mdz@csh.rit.edu Fri Jul 18 08:42:31 2003
Return-path: <mdz@csh.rit.edu>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19dVVG-00031I-00; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 08:42:30 -0500
Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
	by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
	id 19dVVJ-0000mB-00
	for 183390-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:42:33 -0400
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19dVVG-0002i1-00
	for <183390-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:42:30 -0400
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:42:29 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
To: 183390-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: apt-get source doesn't check if package dpkg-dev is installed
Message-ID: <20030718134229.GT13924@alcor.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@alcor.net>
Delivered-To: 183390-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

What would you suggest that it do if dpkg-dev is not installed?  Surely it
should not abort and skip the download of the package, which can still be
unpacked without dpkg-dev.  All it could do is display a warning or such,
which is essentially the same as the current behaviour.

-- 
 - mdz



Reply to: