[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#190862: I'm not sure it's the same thing, but...



Hello,

The original bug report being so terse, I'm not sure my problem is the same
than the one of the original submitter, but I guess so. Or at least, it's
really related. Here is a sniplet of my problem:

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
mquinson@galadriel:/tmp$ sudo apt-get -d install libdb4.1-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  libdb2-dev
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libdb4.1-dev
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 163 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/5193kB of archives.
After unpacking 11.1MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
Download complete and in download only mode
mquinson@galadriel:/tmp$ dpkg -l libdb{2,4.1}-dev
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name                             Version                          Description
+++-================================-================================-================================================================================
ii  libdb2-dev                       2.7.7.0-8                        The Berkeley database routines (development files).
pn  libdb4.1-dev                     <none>                           (no description available)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Why should I say "Yes" to a question asking me if I want to remove my good
old libdb2-dev, if at the end, the package isn't desinstalled (which is
exactly what I want).


Keep the good work on !

Bye, Mt.

-- 
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.



Reply to: