On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Randolph Chung wrote: > - The handling of build-conflicts seems counterintuitive. I haven't seen > an example of a build-conflicts that has a | in it, but I would > suspect "Build-Conflicts: a | b" means we conflict against both a and > b. (policy is not clear on this issue...) In your code you would > remove 'a' only. Typically | is not allowed in a conflicts, it's fairly meaningless. Jason