[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#172777: apt: MMAP problem: same thing here



I got a similar problem (also with apt 0.5.4):

E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing poxml (NewFileVer1)

And "apt-cache policy apt" now dumps core.

 # gdb -c core /usr/bin/apt-cache 
gdb: Symbol `emacs_ctlx_keymap' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
GNU gdb 2002-04-01-cvs
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...(no debugging symbols found)...
Core was generated by `apt-cache policy apt'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2.so.3.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2.so.3.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#0  0x4015a357 in _LIB_VERSION () from /lib/libm.so.6
(gdb) where
#0  0x4015a357 in _LIB_VERSION () from /lib/libm.so.6
#1  0x08053194 in __eh_alloc ()
#2  0x401740bf in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb)  


Hope it helps,


        Frederic

-- 
Frédéric Péters <fpeters@theridion.com> <fpeters@debian.org>
Théridion, spécialistes GNU/Linux, rue de l'Aqueduc 83 - 1050 Bruxelles
GPG: 1024D/6783ED5E: 62BF 2EDA 404A 6EB4 F5BE  A1E2 A11D CBB1 6783 ED5E



Reply to: