Bug#165825: marked as done (apt: wants to upgrade dictionaries-common to same version)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:11:03 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1021021181017.19197A-100000@wakko.debian.net>
and subject line Bug#165825: apt: wants to upgrade dictionaries-common to same version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2002 23:52:56 +0000
>From amu@ucko.debian.net Mon Oct 21 18:52:55 2002
Return-path: <amu@ucko.debian.net>
Received: from pool-141-156-219-184.res.east.verizon.net (ucko.debian.net) [141.156.219.184] (foobar)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 183mLu-0001Wr-00; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:52:55 -0500
Received: from amu by ucko.debian.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 183mLu-0004Jt-00; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 19:52:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apt: wants to upgrade dictionaries-common to same version
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.8
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 19:52:54 -0400
Message-Id: <[🔎] E183mLu-0004Jt-00@ucko.debian.net>
Sender: "Aaron M. Ucko" <amu@ucko.debian.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal
apt-get upgrade always wants to upgrade dictionaries-common from 0.8.1
to 0.8.1 (not a typo) for no apparent reason. Here's what I get from
running apt-cache policy with it versus an unaffected package:
$ apt-cache policy dictionaries-common apt
dictionaries-common:
Installed: 0.8.1
Candidate: 0.8.1
Version Table:
0.8.1 0
500 http://localhost unstable/main Packages
*** 0.8.1 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
apt:
Installed: 0.5.4
Candidate: 0.5.4
Version Table:
*** 0.5.4 0
500 http://localhost unstable/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
(FWIW, http://localhost corresponds to my apt-proxy, and running
apt-cache gencaches makes no difference. Neither does moving aside
the preferences file I hacked up to give X Strike Force packages a low
priority.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tux 2.4.19 #1 Sun Sep 29 19:11:39 EDT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-12 The GNU stdc++ library
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 165825-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2002 00:11:36 +0000
>From jgg@debian.org Mon Oct 21 19:11:36 2002
Return-path: <jgg@debian.org>
Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net (pd6mo3so.prod.shaw.ca) [24.71.223.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 183me0-0002iI-00; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 19:11:36 -0500
Received: from pd3mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr1so-ser.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.177])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <0H4C0062RWIGMF@l-daemon> for 165825-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon,
21 Oct 2002 18:11:04 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml1so.prod.shaw.ca
(pn2ml1so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.145]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <0H4C00GRWWIG86@l-daemon> for 165825-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon,
21 Oct 2002 18:11:04 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from wakko.debian.net ([24.86.210.128])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <0H4C004J6WIGU3@l-daemon> for 165825-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon,
21 Oct 2002 18:11:04 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.debian.net ident=jgg)
by wakko.debian.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 183mdU-0005BJ-00; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:11:04 -0600
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:11:03 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#165825: apt: wants to upgrade dictionaries-common to same
version
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E183mLu-0004Jt-00@ucko.debian.net>
X-Sender: jgg@wakko.debian.net
To: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>, 165825-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>, apt@packages.qa.debian.org
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1021021181017.19197A-100000@wakko.debian.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: 165825-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.1 required=5.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> apt-get upgrade always wants to upgrade dictionaries-common from 0.8.1
> to 0.8.1 (not a typo) for no apparent reason. Here's what I get from
> running apt-cache policy with it versus an unaffected package:
The package you have installed is not exactly the same as the one in the
archive, so apt will upgrade it. If you do apt-cache show
dictionaries-common and look closely at the output you will se that this
is the case.
Jason
Reply to: