Re: Bug#102951: 102951 should not have been set to fixed
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Lazarus Long wrote:
> There is no reason this bug should have been marked as fixed. Nothing is
> done, the alleged "NMU" still has not shown up, and apt-get upgrade is
> still impossible.
Good grief, you are the second person to do this. Sheeze, leave my bugs
alone!
I will explain again since you seem to have missed the note in the merge
message:
The problem is not by any means grave because it is simply fixed by
reducing the length of your sources.list and will go away on it's own when
our mirror network catches up with itself in a few days.
It's marked fixed to help me keep track of what issues are resolved
and which are not (ie it's fixed in CVS, nobody ever NMUs apt.)
Jason
Reply to: