Processed: 102951 should not have been set to fixed

To: Lazarus Long <lazarus@overdue.dhis.net>
Cc: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>(apt #102951 #103020 #97809 #99974)
Subject: Processed: 102951 should not have been set to fixed
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 13:07:41 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.99444006618315.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010706170203.A24037@overdue.dhis.net>
References: <[🔎] 20010706170203.A24037@overdue.dhis.net>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reopen 102951
Bug#102951: apt: bizarre bug, seems related to version checking
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.

> severity 102951 grave
Bug#102951: apt: bizarre bug, seems related to version checking
Bug#97809: general: Wrong dependencies
Bug#99974: apt-get upgrade failures
Bug#103020: upgrade croaks, but -f finds no fault
Severity set to `grave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#102951: 102951 should not have been set to fixed
  - From: Lazarus Long <lazarus@overdue.dhis.net>

Prev by Date: Like to work w/Fortune 500 Co's from home?$$$$
Next by Date: Bug#102951: 102951 should not have been set to fixed
Previous by thread: Bug#102951: 102951 should not have been set to fixed
Next by thread: Re: Bug#102951: 102951 should not have been set to fixed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread