[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#102423: marked as done (no errors on invalid syntax in /etc/apt/preferences)



Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:58:03 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1010626195649.5343D-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
and subject line Bug#102423: no errors on invalid syntax in /etc/apt/preferences
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2001 00:14:23 +0000
>From wichert@wiggy.net Tue Jun 26 19:14:23 2001
Return-path: <wichert@wiggy.net>
Received: from morsig.xs4all.nl (mx1.mors.wiggy.net) [::ffff:213.84.43.14] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15F2yN-0000MW-00; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:14:23 -0500
Received: from wichert by mx1.mors.wiggy.net with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 15F2yM-0001pv-00; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:14:22 +0200
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@mors.wiggy.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: no errors on invalid syntax in /etc/apt/preferences
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:14:22 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E15F2yM-0001pv-00@mx1.mors.wiggy.net>
Sender: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.3
Severity: normal

If there is a syntax or other error in the preferences file apt
silently ignores it, which makes it extremely hard to debug
problems.

Wichert.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thunder 2.4.2-ac23-lvm091b6 #2 Fri Mar 23 23:35:00 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-1

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                  2.2.3-6           GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.010604 The GNU stdc++ library            


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 102423-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2001 01:58:09 +0000
>From jgg@debian.org Tue Jun 26 20:58:09 2001
Return-path: <jgg@debian.org>
Received: from cast-ext.ab.videon.ca [::ffff:206.75.216.34] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15F4am-00040o-00; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:58:08 -0500
Received: (qmail 287 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2001 01:58:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63]) (envelope-sender <jgg@debian.org>)
          by cast-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <wichert@mors.wiggy.net>; 27 Jun 2001 01:58:03 -0000
Received: from localhost
	([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg)
	by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
	id 15F4ah-0001Ok-00; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:58:03 -0600
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:58:03 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>
X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com
To: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@mors.wiggy.net>, 102423-done@bugs.debian.org
cc: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>, 
    debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, 
    APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#102423: no errors on invalid syntax in /etc/apt/preferences
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E15F2yM-0001pv-00@mx1.mors.wiggy.net>
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1010626195649.5343D-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 102423-done@bugs.debian.org


On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> If there is a syntax or other error in the preferences file apt
> silently ignores it, which makes it extremely hard to debug
> problems.

All syntax errors are detected. Problems related to misnamed fields,
non-existant packages, non-existing version spects, etc are ignored as you
would expect.

Jason




Reply to: