Re: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get?

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: 81829@bugs.debian.org, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get?
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:16:05 -0700 (MST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1010215151544.12470A-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.NEB.4.33.0102152253530.18255-100000@tethys.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>

On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> I was a bit unclear: I did a 'rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*' followed by an
> 'update'. Before there was nothing new for 'update' but now there was. I

The 'now there was' is just due to usual Package file updation.

Jason

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get?
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#86109: apt: "apt-cache search rsync" eats all my memory
Next by Date: [BETA] apt 0.4.10 no longer works as method for updating dselect
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get?
Next by thread: Bug#86109: apt: "apt-cache search rsync" eats all my memory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread